Welcome to the International Multidisciplinary Research Journal Reviews (IMRJR). Your expertise is vital in maintaining the quality and integrity of our journal. Below are the guidelines to help you through the review process.
- Purpose of Review
The primary aim of the review process is to provide constructive feedback to authors, ensure the quality of published research, and uphold the journal’s academic standards. As a reviewer, your evaluation will help the editorial team make informed decisions regarding manuscript acceptance.
- Confidentiality
All manuscripts received for review are confidential. Do not share the content of the manuscript or discuss it with others. Any potential conflict of interest must be disclosed before you proceed with the review.
- Criteria for Review
When evaluating a manuscript, consider the following criteria:
- Originality: Does the manuscript present new ideas, methods, or findings?
- Relevance: Is the research relevant to the journal’s scope and the interests of its readership?
- Methodology: Is the research design appropriate? Are the methods clearly described and correctly applied?
- Analysis: Are the results presented clearly? Is the data analyzed appropriately?
- Clarity and Structure: Is the manuscript well-organized? Are the arguments clear and coherent?
- Literature Review: Is the literature relevant and adequately cited? Does the paper build on existing knowledge?
- Conclusions: Are the conclusions supported by the data? Are they significant and well-articulated?
- Review Process
- Timeliness: Aim to complete your review within 5 days of receiving the manuscript. If you need more time, please communicate with the editorial office.
- Constructive Feedback: Provide clear, specific, and constructive feedback. Highlight both strengths and areas for improvement.
- Recommendation: At the end of your review, provide a recommendation for the editorial board (e.g., accept, minor revisions, major revisions, reject).
- Writing Your Review
- Introduction: Briefly summarize the manuscript and your overall impression.
- Detailed Comments: Organize your comments by section (introduction, methodology, results, discussion, etc.). Use bullet points for clarity.
- Suggestions for Improvement: Offer practical suggestions for enhancing the manuscript.
- Confidential Comments to the Editor: If necessary, include any confidential remarks that you believe should be communicated to the editorial team.
- Ethical Considerations
- Bias: Maintain objectivity and avoid any personal biases. Reviewers should base their assessments solely on the content and quality of the research.
- Plagiarism: Check for any signs of plagiarism. If you identify issues, report them to the editorial team.
- Final Steps
Once you have completed your review:
- Submit your review to editor@imrjr.com
- Keep a copy of your review for your records, but do not disclose it to others.
- Acknowledgment
We appreciate your time and effort in reviewing manuscripts for IMRJR. Your contributions play a crucial role in advancing knowledge across disciplines.
If you are interested in becoming a reviewer or editor, please send your updated profile to editor@imrjr.com.
Copyright Form