βœ‰οΈ editor@imrjr.com
International Multidisciplinary Research Journal Reviews (IMRJR)
International Multidisciplinary Research Journal Reviews (IMRJR) A monthly Peer-reviewed journal
e-ISSN 3108-026X
← Back to VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, FEBRUARY 2025

Performance Analysis of Mod-LEACH, LEACH, DEEC, EDEEC, TDEEC in Wireless Camera Sensor Network

Nishant Tripathi

πŸ‘ 1 viewπŸ“₯ 0 downloads
Share: 𝕏 f in ✈ βœ‰
Abstract: Wireless Camera Sensor Networks (WCSNs) play a pivotal role in modern surveillance and monitoring systems due to their ability to capture and transmit visual data in real-time. However, the energy constraints of sensor nodes pose significant challenges in maintaining network longevity and performance. This study conducts a comprehensive performance analysis of five clustering protocols: Mod-LEACH (Modified Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy), LEACH (Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy), DEEC (Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering), EDEEC (Enhanced Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering), and TDEEC (Threshold Distributed Energy- Efficient Clustering) in the context of WCSNs. Each protocol is evaluated based on key performance metrics such as energy consumption, network lifetime, packet delivery ratio, and throughput. Mod-LEACH introduces enhancements to the standard LEACH protocol, aiming to improve energy efficiency by dynamically adjusting the cluster head election process. DEEC, EDEEC, and TDEEC employ different strategies for energy-efficient clustering and cluster head selection, with DEEC utilizing residual energy, EDEEC enhancing DEEC by incorporating balanced energy consumption, and TDEEC introducing a threshold-based approach to optimize energy distribution. Simulation results demonstrate that Mod-LEACH outperforms traditional LEACH in terms of energy conservation and network stability. DEEC, EDEEC, and TDEEC exhibit superior performance by extending the network lifetime compared to LEACH, with EDEEC achieving the most balanced energy usage across the network. TDEEC shows improved packet delivery and throughput, indicating its effectiveness in high-density networks. The analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each protocol, providing insights into their suitability for various WCSN applications. The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate clustering protocols to enhance the performance and sustainability of WCSNs, paving the way for future research and development in energy-efficient wireless sensor networks.

Keywords: Clustering, LEACH, Wireless Networks, Energy Efficiency, Cluster Head

How to Cite:

[1] Nishant Tripathi, β€œPerformance Analysis of Mod-LEACH, LEACH, DEEC, EDEEC, TDEEC in Wireless Camera Sensor Network,” International Multidisciplinary Research Journal Reviews (IMRJR) (IMRJR), DOI: 10.17148/IMRJR.2025.020205

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Google Scholar
Highest Citations
98+
h-index 3  |  i10-index 1
Peer-reviewed
Author Center
IMRJR Standards
πŸ†
Article of the Year
Award
The Future of Automotive Manufacturing: Integrating AI, ML, and Generative AI for Next-Gen Automatic Cars

Chandrakanth Rao Madhavaram, Janardhana Rao Sunkara, Chandrababu Kuraku, Eswar Prasad Galla, Hemanth Kumar Gollangi

Read Article β†’
πŸ“₯Most Downloaded
  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    doi logo
    πŸ“₯ 5 downloads
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
Conference
Conference
International Conference Call for papers